Volver a la Academia
    Seguridad aérea

    Redundancia: por qué los problemas técnicos no implican necesariamente fallos del sistema

    Escrito por Alex Gervash, piloto comercial (31 años) y especialista en fobia a volar (18 años, más de 16 000 casos tratados)

    Tu mente te dice que, si algo falla, todo el avión se estrella. La realidad es que el avión es una fortaleza de ingeniería basada en la redundancia.

    Redundancia: por qué los problemas técnicos no implican necesariamente fallos del sistema

    You see a piece of plastic tape on the armrest and you panic. You hear a strange noise and think the engines are failing. Your mind says: "If one thing breaks the whole plane comes down." It assumes the plane is a fragile house of cards. The reality is that the aircraft is an engineering fortress built on redundancy.

    Aviation operates on the philosophy of "assume failure." We assume parts will break. We design the plane to fly safely when they do. A commercial aircraft has six million parts. Statistically something might fail. That is why we have backups for the backups.

    Take the electrical system. You do not have one source of power. You have four main generators. If they fail you have an Auxiliary Power Unit (APU). If that fails you have batteries. If those fail you have a Ram Air Turbine (RAT) that drops out of the wing and generates electricity from the wind. That is eight independent sources of power.

    It is the same for other systems. We have three independent hydraulic systems. We have five backup navigation systems. We can fly on one engine. We can glide with zero engines. The plane is tested for twelve years before it is even certified for passengers. Engineers spend years thinking about every possible failure mode so you do not have to.

    When you hear about a "technical issue" causing a delay it is actually good news. It means the system is working. Before every flight we consult the Minimum Equipment List (MEL). This manual tells us exactly what can be broken and what must be working. If a sensor is out and the MEL says "No Go" then we do not go. We fix it. The delay is safety in action.

    En resumen

    Tu mente te dice que, si algo falla, todo el avión se estrella. La realidad es que el avión es una fortaleza de ingeniería basada en la redundancia.

    Alex Gervash: experto en miedo a volar y piloto

    Acerca del autor

    Alex Gervash

    Piloto y especialista en miedo a volar

    • Piloto comercial (31 años de experiencia en aviación)
    • Formado en psicología y terapia del trauma (EMDR, Somatic Experiencing)
    • Fundador de phobia.aero y de la aplicación SkyGuru

    Alex Gervash leverages 31 years of commercial cockpit knowledge alongside 18 years of psychology expertise to help passengers overcome fear of flying through a unique blend of aviation facts and trauma therapy. Having supported over 16,000 individuals, his restorative approach integrates somatic experiencing and nervous system regulation to address the root causes of aerophobia, such as turbulence fear or a specific landing fear. Through his SkyGuru app, which provides in-flight support to 200,000+ users, Alex ensures that complex concepts like turbulence explained are accessible, helping travelers find peace of mind by understanding why technical redundancies prevent crashes.

    16,000+ayudó
    Reconocimiento de la ONUNaciones
    31 añosaviación
    Expertoexperiencia